Denmark. Once upon a time there was a prince who wanted to find a princess, but ... In the morning she was asked how she had slept. ... prince took her for his wife, because now he knew that he had a real prince
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Feb 09, 2010 · British parliament passes unpopular Tea Act On April 27, 1773, the British Parliament passes the Tea Act, a bill designed to save the faltering East India Company from bankruptcy
We need to increase the number we have German D I mean GDP we have the US doesn't increase are we increasing yes we are so what's the treaty so what's my company tell me the company is right in front of us so we're looking around to see the increase
