Answer:
75 shares
Explanation:
In this specific scenario, it seems that Kevin is treated to 75 shares prior to the redemption. This is calculated by adding the 50 shares that Kevin holds directly prior to the redemption itself as well as the 25 extra shares that are held by AMI. These 25 shares are 50% of the total 50 shares that AMI holds since Kevin is a 50% partner.
Answer:
1. Rule out other explanations such as an error by the computer distributor.
Explanation:
The best and most appropriate action is to rule out explanation. There can be an error with the shipment or by computer distributor. Before suspecting Bill for the missing computer we need to seek explanation from him. The computer can either be loss or missed out when shipped. Bill should be asked to explain the missing inventory. The explanation from Bill can be a point for further investigation.
Answer:
The correct cost of inventory that Coronado should report is $367300
Explanation:
The goods sent on consignment still belong to the consignor until they are sold off by the consignee. So, the consignor should add the unsold consignment goods in its inventory. Thus we will add the cost of goods sent on consignment to the value of inventory.
Value of inventory = 321000 + 46300 = $367300
The goods purchased by Coronado on 27 December with FOB destination should not be added to the cost of inventory as with FOB destination terms, the goods do not belong to the buyer until they are delivered to their destination by the seller.
Thus, the correct cost of inventory that Coronado should report is $367300
Answer:
$7,500
Explanation:
Lee, Inc. acquired 30% of Polk Corp.'s voting stock on January 1, Year 1 for $100,000.
During Year 1, Polk earned $40,000 and paid dividends of $25,000.
Therefore Lee's dividend income = 0.3 x 25,000 = $7,500
Before income taxes, the amount that Lee should include in its Year 1 Income Statement as a result of the investment will be the dividend earned in year 1 which is $7,500
Answer:
B. its application to real-life organizations
Explanation:
The answer to this is most likely B because the strength of the team leadership model is application to real-life organizations.
