Answer:
A). Failed to exercise due care.
Explanation:
As per the given details, Bugle Corp. needs to prove that Dennis & Co. failed to exert the required care which it was supposed to exercise while auditing the financial statements of Stanley Corp. <u>This failure led Bugle Corp. to suffer major losses and thus, they must be accountable for this loss under the general law as they ignored the potential hazards</u>. Legally, this is unlawful as they were expected to ensure that these hazards must have addressed and told Bugle Corp. on time but since they failed, they are guilty of the crime. Hence, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Explanation:
Debit $ Credit$
a. Cash 3000000
Sales revennue (500*6000) 3000000
Warranty expenses 55000
Estimated warranty liability 55000
Estimated warranty liability 20000
Cash account 20000
b. Cash account 3000000
Sales revenue (500*6000- 56000) 2944000
Unearned warranty revenue 56000
Warranty expenses 20000
Cash account 20000
Unearned warranty revenue 20364
Warranty revenue (56000*20000/55000) 20364
Answer:
C. $13,700
Explanation:
Given that;
Beginning retained earnings = $4,000
Net income during the period = $10,000
Dividends = $300
Computation of Ending balance in the retained earnings account
= Beginning retained earnings + Net income during the period - Dividends
= $4,000 + $10,000 - $300
= $13,700
Therefore, the ending balance in the retained earnings account is $13,700
Answer:
the size of M1 can only be a fraction of checkable deposits.
Explanation:
fractional reserve banking system requires that a fraction banks receive as deposits from customers be kept as reserves with the central bank and the rest be made out as loans.
M1 consists of coins, demand deposits and currency in circulation. Banks determine the money in circulation by giving out loans. so the size of M1 can only be a fraction of checkable deposits.
Answer:
The correct answer is option (a) The court probably found that the state law was unconstitutional under the supremacy cause.
Explanation:
Solution
From the given questions it states that, What would be the court's most likely response to Ralph's lawsuit.
The court's decision response would be that, I that when the situation arises or occurs in that case, where there is a conflict which arises between federal and state law then in that case federal law must be applied.
