Answer:
C. It considers fixed manufacturing overhead cost as product costs.
Explanation:
The statement that is true of absorption costing is that it considers fixed manufacturing overhead cost as product costs.
Absorption costing uses the concept of cost drivers to ascertain the quantum of fixed manufacturing overhead cost a product generates, and ties that fraction to the product as its own cost.
By so doing, what would ordinarily have been periodic costs that will be apportioned among products become fixed costs that are directly traceable to those products.
Answer: A - Rapid elasticity
Explanation: Rapid elasticity is a cloud computing term for scalable provisioning, or the ability to provide scalable services. It allows users to automatically request additional space in the cloud or other types of services.
Those who provide guidelines for cloud computing recommend tools like monitoring and audit trails to tightly control all of the diverse requests and transactions that happen in the provision of cloud services, and the rapid elasticity that provides so much benefit to those who use the cloud.
David wants to know if his company’s resources are being used in the best, most productive manner in order to achieve company goals. David wants to know his organization’s efficiency.
<h3>What is the significance of the organization’s efficiency?</h3>
Organizational efficiency of an organization mainly examines and determines how to increase the productivity of an organization by using a specific amount of resources.
Organization’s efficiency plays a very significant role in the smooth and effective operations of the firm as it helps the organization achieving the objectives.
Basically, the efficiency of an organization completely depends on its employees, resources, goals and objectives.
Learn more about organization’s efficiency here:-
brainly.com/question/13021831
#SPJ4
Answer:
B) the uneven distribution of gains and losses from free trade.
Explanation:
One of the most important reasons why governments impose trade barriers is to protect domestic jobs (and domestic industries). We are part of a society (country), and society's most important component is people, not money. Generally the economic gains of free trade are larger than the economic losses, but the economic losses hurt the most.
Imagine if no trade barriers actually existed, how many millions of jobs would be lost in the US. Trade barriers are nothing new, the current president didn't invent them. He just incinerated them.
How does a leader tell the people that 10 or 20 million must lose their jobs and probably will not be able to find any similar jobs in the future just because the rest of society will benefit from cheaper products. The lives of 20 million households (50-80 million people) would be destroyed, while 280 million people would benefit.
The amount of harm done to the people that lose their jobs is much greater than any individual benefit.
Answer:
$8,770.00
Explanation:
In this question we use the present value formula i.e shown in the attachment below:
Data provided in the question
Future value = $0
Rate of interest = 0.48%
NPER = 4 years × 12 months = 48 months
PMT = $205
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the answer would be $8,770.00
