1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rina8888 [55]
3 years ago
12

Plz answer these two questions

History
2 answers:
topjm [15]3 years ago
7 0
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values." These are one of the reasons why they should promote democracy aboard
8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. ... It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy.

Explanation:

hope this helps

You might be interested in
Fun facts about Dominique Dawes
Afina-wow [57]
Dominique Dawes.Dominique Dawes<span> became the first African-American Olympic gymnast to win a medal in any individual gymnastics event. She took home the bronze medal in Atlanta for her floor exercise and a team gold medal.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following do tomatoes and love not have in common? a. association with the color red c. Japanese culture b. growth
daser333 [38]
The answer would be C
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
witch statement about the political competition between the soviet union and the united states in the vietnom war is true
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.

6 0
2 years ago
In what way did feudalism in Japan and medieval Europe differ?
Sladkaya [172]

The answer is B. Feudalism in Japan was based on traditional customs, whereas  feudalism in Europe was based on native religions.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was not a result of the sputnik launch
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

increased American confidence

Explanation:The Soviet Union was the first nation to successfully launch a satellite into space. The Sputnik Crisis was a defining influence in the official founding of NASA and it also increased the fear among the American public that the Soviets were superior since they ha success with the technology first.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who killed martin luther king jr trivia crack?
    14·2 answers
  • A powerful ruler of the kingdom or empire is known as a
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements accurately describes one effect World War
    7·1 answer
  • 2. What is the problem with the periodisation of Indian<br>history that James Mill offers?​
    9·1 answer
  • Why is learning about different forms of government important?
    15·1 answer
  • What are two things that all the delegates agreed they wanted in the Constitution
    15·1 answer
  • Based on your knowledge of world history, which of the following factors contributed most directly to the Mughal Empire’s territ
    12·1 answer
  • What are areas of science and medicine did the ancient Egyptians study
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following discoveries offered the most help to historians in understanding ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics? a. The t
    12·1 answer
  • It is not necessary to vote even though you have the opportunity to do so.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!