The answer is D France exercised more direct control over its African colonies
The declarations of the letter to the U.S. Congress by the economists concerning the bailouts are evidently specified the disagreement of the source of the letter about the GM bailout. The document stated that the bailout would disrupt the notion of free market in U.S. and that it will break the people who held in the free market (Velasquez, 2012). Also, the bailout and government interference will shift the free market economy into socialism (ibid). The economists and other parties which is convoluted in the making of the letter, sustained the free market economy. They do not approve on government interruption as it disrupts the mechanism of the market that is free of any interference particularly from the government. The sources of the letter thought that it was GM’s own accountability to bail itself out of the insolvency. The bankruptcy was a consequence of bad management of the company and it was its own accountability to resolve the matter. The interference by the government will move the market mechanism. The bailout will disturb the equal right of the people of life, freedom, and possessions as what John Locke’s notion. Furthermore, government meddling will also lower the public’s safety based on Adam Smith’s theory.
Its called Passive resistence
Answer: He hoped to find routes to Africa.
Explanation: Price Henry of Portugal sponsored voyages of discovery because he hoped to find a route to Africa. He wanted to trade with Africans. He was fondly called the “Navigator”, he never went on any of the voyages he sponsored. He colonizers island groups such as the Azores and Madeira. He was a 15th century Portuguese prince who helped originate the age of discovery and the Atlantic slave trade. He founded colonies that are previously unknown to the Europeans.
