1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lidiya [134]
3 years ago
10

High and unexpected inflation has a greater cost Group of answer choices for savers in low income tax brackets than for savers i

n high income tax brackets. for those who hold a little money than for those who hold a lot of money. for those whose wages increase by as much as inflation than those who are paid a fixed nominal wage. for those who save than for those who borrow.
Business
1 answer:
barxatty [35]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

for those who save than for those who borrow.

Explanation:

Inflation is a persistent rise in general price levels

inflation is unexpected if it is unanticipated and not factored in to factors such as interest rate.

savers are at a disadvantage when there is high and unexpected inflation because the value of savings would fall fast.

while borrowers are at an advantage because they repay less in value than what what they borrowed

You might be interested in
Which of the following people are structurally unemployed? Select all answer options that apply. Choose one or more: A. Your mec
raketka [301]

Answer:  All except option B and E

 

Explanation: In simple word, structural unemployment refers to the situation when some of the individuals seeking employment do not get the jobs that suits their knowledge and qualification.

It occurs due to shifting in the economy which results in difficulty of finding jobs by a particular group. Loose of jobs by factory workers due to the technological advancement is one of many examples of structural unemployment.

3 0
3 years ago
On May 1, 2015, Pinkley Company sells office furniture for $300,000 cash. The office furniture originally cost $750,000 when pur
Savatey [412]

Answer:

$45,000

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Selling cost of the furniture on May 1, 2015 = $300,000

Original cost of the machine on January 1, 2008 = $750,000

Depreciable Life of the furniture = 10 years

Salvage value = $75,000

Now,

Annual depreciation = \frac{\textup{Purchasing cost - salvage value}}{\textup{life}}

or

Annual depreciation = \frac{\textup{750,000 - 75,000}}{\textup{10}}

or

Annual depreciation = $67,500 per year

The total duration from the date of purchase to date of selling

= 7 years 4 months

or

= 7 × 12 + 4 months

= 88 months

= \frac{88}{12} years

therefore,

The total accumulated depreciation till the date of sale

= Annual depreciation × Duration

= $67,500 × \frac{88}{12}

= $495,000

Thus,

The book value on  May 1, 2015

= Purchasing cost - Accumulated depreciation

= $750,000 - $495,000

= $255,000

Hence,

The gain recognized = Selling cost - Book value

= $300,000 - $255,000

= $45,000

8 0
4 years ago
Bob, Jack and Norman are the only people living on an island. They are trying to decide whether or not they should build a light
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

Efficiency requires that one lighthouse is built since the willingness to pay of all the residents together is larger than the cost of providing the lighthouse

Explanation:

Since the lighthouse is a public good, according to the coase theorem, if the combined willingness to pay for the lighthouse of all of the people living on the islands is higher than the cost of the lighthouse, then a lighthouse should be built.

The total willingness to pay is:

W = \$1000+\$1200+\$500 = \$2700

The population willingness to pay is higher than the cost of building one lighthouse ($2000) but lower than the cost of building two lighthouses ($4000). Therefore, efficiency requires that one lighthouse is built since the willingness to pay of all the residents together is larger than the cost of providing the lighthouse.

6 0
3 years ago
A vertical aggregate supply curve Multiple Choice Implies that supply-side policies will have no effect on the macro equilibrium
Hoochie [10]

Answer:

Implies that aggregate demand shifts have no impact on output.

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Why is communism disappearing?<br><br> Hint: (demand market v. Command market)
Luda [366]

Answer:

Because of the overpowering status of Capitalism.

Explanation:

In Marxist and Communist Thought or Ideology (sometimes the same thing), there are many different perspectives on the matter. The Classical Marxist thought would say that Communism never truly existed, and cannot be a regime. False regimes have come up under the guise of Communism (but truly monarchies without religion), but they were truly supporters of the Capitalist cause (which isn't as much an unjust cause as it is a necessary cause). Without Capitalism, true Communism would never come around.

Marxist-Leninists might say that they disappeared because of rightist agendas of some members of Communist parties. Or they might say that Communism has not died out, but lives on in places such as DPRK (North Korea) and Venezuela or Cuba.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Riverbend Inc. received a $250,000 dividend from stock it held in Hobble Corporation. Riverbend's taxable income is $2,460,000 b
    15·1 answer
  • What are 4 workplace trends
    15·1 answer
  • "A customer contributed $50,000 to a variable annuity contract. The account value has grown over the years and the NAV is now $7
    9·1 answer
  • GM typically solicits bids from global suppliers to produce a particular component and awards a 1-year contract to the supplier
    13·1 answer
  • Liability to pay only under certain conditions is what
    15·1 answer
  • Anton believes his company's overhead costs are driven (affected) by the number of machine hours because the production process
    15·1 answer
  • Dee’s made two announcements concerning its common stock today. First, the company announced that the next annual dividend will
    7·1 answer
  • Thanks in advance ! I really need this
    6·1 answer
  • Is the decision of investing in the stock market rational or bounded rational? Please give logical reasoning to support your ans
    6·1 answer
  • You are the manager of a small pharmaceutical company that received a patent on a new drug three years ago. Despite strong sales
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!