Answer: According to research males who carried weapons were three times more likely to be victimized as those who did not.
Explanation:
A weapon has a way of giving a sign that someone is ready for violence and the perpetrators of violence will be drawn to pushing that person's buttons in order to see how they will respond .
Mostly when teenagers carry a weapon they sometimes feel powerful and stronger and they may tend to be provocative towards others around them as they do this they may be killed in the process by the more experienced people .
Based on the scenario above, the event that will likely take
place on Jason’s life is that his immune response is likely to drop or it will
be dropping because of the stress that he is experiencing because of the
problems that he is encountering.
Answer:
The inability to predict in an accurate ways based on a deep and deterministic explanation for somebody's behaviour, and failing to explain individual and particular for every very single person.
Explanation:
Human behavior and motivation, are complex and often involve using a theory while disregarding another one less accurate.
In psychology, there are bodies of thought (for example psychodynamic approach) and often when psychology is applied to human behavior it contrasts with the results that were produced in lab conditions with animals. Thus unable to make clear predictions.
The psychology is based on questionable assumptions, that skeptics often attack. Most of the methodology uses a qualitative approach that contrasts to the quantitive method used by hard science like Physics or Chemistry.
We can then think of psychology as a field that gives some insight to our species but still, cannot evaluate the individual mind since everyone still will show certain actions and behaviors that are very particular to that person.
The correct answer is the physical environment
There are several factors that contribute to change and innovation in a society: factors internal to the society itself or external factors of the environment that surrounds it. Nowadays, the extreme importance of the relationship between society and its environment has become very clear. The environment is not only a crucial source for the maintenance of society with its climatic and geographic characteristics in general, its natural wealth, its sources of energy, its flora and fauna, all functioning as a set of conditions in relation to which the society must adapt. In this process, society can interact with its environment in different ways and directions: either contributing to improve or to worsen and impair its living conditions. Changes in the environment end up forcing changes in society. Societies, throughout history, have needed to adjust to changes in the environment. This is an unquestionable adaptation process.
The environment to which a society must adapt also includes other societies with which it maintains contact. A major change in one tends to trigger a chain process with consequences for the others and forcing adjustments and innovations.
But there are other sources of change. The dynamics of forces within societies, which are part of the human condition itself, prevent society from remaining permanently stable. First, in the transmission of cultural heritage from one generation to another, changes of various types occur. As we saw earlier, individuals are not passive in forming habits, learning customs and receiving information as they grow and develop. Human beings are apparently, by their very nature, motivated to try new patterns of action. Motivation is often the simple curiosity that can be intensified by the cultural world. Or, the motivation may be simple material self-interest. Men seek to maximize their rewards, that is, to earn more and better as a result of their actions. In this way, experimentation and innovations are inevitable.
When solving problems, a child in the concrete operational stage is able to apply <u>logical thinking </u>but is generally not yet able to apply <u>abstract</u><u> </u><u>reasoning</u>.
<h3>What is Logical thinking?</h3>
Logical thinking is the ability of a person to base one's inferences and deductions on facts rather than assumptions.
It is a disciplined manner of thinking. Abstract reasoning on the other hand is the ability to apply logical thinking to ideas that are beyond that which can be readily observed.
Learn more about Logical Thinking at:
brainly.com/question/24487384
