Answer:
The 17-1800s period called "The Enlightenment" made the American colonist believe several things against King George III or an absolute monarchy:
1. The king should not have full authority.
2. The American should take independence from the British, specifically King George III.
3. The king was unfair to the Americans.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment was a period where philosophers used a different way of thinking to solve problems. An example of a text from this period is "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine.
This book explained how King George had been unfair to and ignored the American colonist. It also supported the fact that Americans should become independent from the British and make their own nation, which is known as the United States today.
Contributions like these go against an absolute monarchy where the king holds most if not all the high power of the land among man. Instead, it supports the fact of the people of having a say in the government and the authority.
Answer: C. Limited governments tend to deal with protests and criticism harshly by imprisoning participants.
Explanation:
The limited government has limited powers and rights. This government includes the limited group of people, money, documents that are utilized by this government to run. It avails the right to vote to the public. For example, in India the center has more power then state. Some of the decisions taken by the state government are required to be approved by the union or center government. As a result of limited power execution some of the decisions necessary for the public are not taken by the government this is the reason for public protests and criticism. The protestors agitate for their freedom being imprison.
Answer:
It created new jobs, increased production speed, and led to bigger cities being formed because of people working in the factories and businesses!
The agreement about the way to represent enslaved people is the Three-Fifths Compromise of 1787. It was stated in the Constitutional Convention that slaves should be counted as three-fifths of a person, the clause intent to balance the power and influence that the counting of slaves in the Southern could have in elections.
The representatives were defined by the number of population and Southern had many slaves and wanted all of them to be counted as voters but they were still treated as property and were not taxed as free people, because the number of slaves was much bigger in southern than northern states, that already abolished slaving, the northern fought back for a fairly counting for the representatives, so they came to an agreement to count three slaves out of every five slaves regarding the population of each state and for taxation matters.
