Answer: um this is kinda a personal question so it depends how you answer it because it says you not me.
Sorry I can’t help
The answer is "<span>Extreme awkwardness."</span>
Answer:
A metrical foot or prosody is the basic unit known as the property of a single verse that composes a pattern of rhythm and sound in a poem.
Explanation:
Within the unit, we can find a limited number of syllables that correspond to the pattern of the foot. Thus, each line of poetry will follow a certain meter in its words.
Both qualitative variables and quantitative variables present important data for the research. However, qualitative variables do not allow an order between these data, while quantitative variables allow these data to be presented with numerical values.
Although you did not submit the survey this question refers to, we can reach the answer above because:
- Qualitative variables present data, without the presence of numbers.
- These data cannot be measured and are related to visual observations, or subjective analysis, through questions, opinions, presence of characteristics, among others.
- Quantitative variables present numerous, well-defined and measurable data.
- They propose data with specific values, which are obtained through measurement.
- In this case, these values can be used in statistical systems, calculations, graphs, and other information.
Both variables are important in a research because of the degree of information they provide in different needs and situations.
More information:
brainly.com/question/14662435?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
To study the processes by which past behaviour influences future behaviour, participants were led to believe that without being aware of it, they had expressed either support for or opposition to the institution of comprehensive exams. Judgment and response time data suggested that participants’ perceptions of their past behaviour often influenced their decisions to repeat the behaviour. This influence was partly the result of cognitive activity that influenced participants’ cognitions about specific behavioural consequences and the attitude they based on these cognitions. More generally, however, feedback about past behaviour had a direct effect on participants’ attitudes and ultimate behavioural decisions that were independent of the outcome-specific cognitions. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for biased scanning of memory, dissonance reduction, self-perception, and the use of behaviour as a heuristic.
