I believe the answer is: No
An action is considered to be constitutional if it follows the regulation that is written under our constitution. According to the constitution ,The federal judge would held their position for the rest of their life. So limiting it to six years would not follow the regulation under the constitution.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
A) Pre-conventional stage.
Here, the decisions an individual might make when considering whether or not to cheat on an exam is directly related to external control. More specifically, is related to what the individual was taught in the family environment. What mom and dad taught you, In this stage, the children or the person remembers that he/she has to obey the rules imposed by an authoritative figure.
B) Conventional stage
In this stage, the individual has considerations about his personal and social experiences. He/she makes decisions because the individual understands that positive decisions bring positive outcomes and vice versa. So that is why he/she thinks it is better not to cheat on the exam.
C) Post-conventional stage.
During this stage, the person considers more abstract concerns about what is right and what is wrong. The individual question the morality of the rules established. So here is more prone to cheat.
These three stages of Moral Development were developed by scientist Lawrence Kohlberg.
For most of them, centrally planned economy usually determine what kind of occupation that its people have (we have no freedom to choose our jobs)
Not only that, usually there is no wage gap between each occupations like we see in the free market.
