1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rusak2 [61]
3 years ago
10

In recent years there have been reports of restaurant employees spitting into food they serve to get even with customers they do

not like. Such an action would constitute a tort and a crime.
Social Studies
1 answer:
ludmilkaskok [199]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes. Such an action constitutes a tort and a crime.

Explanation:

A tort is a wrong done to another person while a crime is the breaking of the law of the state or Federal  government. Put simply, a tort is a wrongdoing on a personal level while a crime is a wrongdoing on a societal level, while tort is privately morally wrong, crime is publicly legally wrong.

In the scenario above there is a 'tort' because the employees are spitting into the food of those they do not like. This is on a personal level as they are not spitting into the food of every customer but only the food of those they dislike. Also, a crime exists because this is happening at a public place. It can be said that those restaurants are intentionally serving unhealthy foods to members of the public and both the owners and employees of those restaurants could be charged.

You might be interested in
Explain Ruth's loyalty and summarize her story.
Scilla [17]

Answer:

As a child, Ruth (Elana Eden) is sold to a group of pagans and reared to be a priestess to their gods and idols. But, as an adult, she meets the Hebrew Mahlon (Tom Tryon), and is intrigued by his morality and monotheism. She eventually falls in love with him and adopts his faith. However, the couple soon find themselves persecuted -- Mahlon is imprisoned and Ruth is cast into the wilderness. After Ruth's attempt to free Mahlon goes horribly wrong, she redoubles her commitment to God.

6 0
3 years ago
Organized crime families and the hippie movement of the 1960s are examples of countercultures in the united states. please selec
viva [34]

This statement is TRUE.

A counterculture is defined as a cultural system whose norms and behaviors differ from the ones generally accepted in mainstream society. Countercultural movements emerge inside those mainstream societies, mainly because some groups of people stop sharing the generally accepted principles and become critical to them. In fact, such movements can be the starting point of dramatic cultural changes.

  • Organized crime is a manner of subculture which shows disrespect for the mainstream rules and functions according to a different and own system. Therefore it is a counterculture.
  • The hippie movement was the main counterculture of the 1960s-1970s. It was an anti-establishment phenomenon and was very visible during the Civil Rights Movement and in the protests that opposed the US policies in Vietnam.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Crusades and the Renaissance open up a network of trade?
prisoha [69]

The main trade routes from the east passed through the Byzantine Empire or the Arab lands and onwards to the ports of Genoa, Pisa, and Venice. Luxury goods bought in the Levant, such as spices, dyes, and silks, were imported to Italy and then resold throughout Europe.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!! XD

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me and answer this question. (x2)
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer: the second one: “work together to make just and equal laws”

Explanation:

The Pilgrims didn’t have the Native Americans in mind when they made the Compact, so the first one isn’t correct. The Pilgrims also didn’t have the Spanish in mind, and technically they were on the way to New England when they made the Compact, so they didn’t know whether or not the Spanish made a fort, so the second one is incorrect. Finally, the third one is incorrect because the Pilgrims were very strict when it came to their religion, and church was a must.

5 0
3 years ago
Consider how Kurtz and the pilgrims act differently in the following settingsthe following reveal the hypocrisy of imperialism.
sergeinik [125]

Answer:

Kurtz and the pilgrims acted as per the local culture and other factors

Explanation:

In different settings, Kurtz and the pilgrims acted differently as per the local society and other factors.

In Belgium, Kurtz and the pilgrims acted in a civilized way as they found the society very civilized but lacking in depth.

In Congo, Kurtz and the pilgrims acted like savages and started taking up their cultures and norms. They started killing enemies and displaying their skulls as an award or something of pride.

On the steamer, Kurtz was weak and was dying. Hence, he was vulnerable and therefore, Marlow thinks that Kurtz is a good person after all.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the balance theory, a system (composed of observer, person, and object) is referred to as a _____.
    11·1 answer
  • Immigrants can contribute most significantly to changes in the city's physical form by creating __________.
    8·2 answers
  • What are three measures citizens can take to assist community members in the event of a natural disaster?
    12·1 answer
  • What type of economic system is created when these two system are combined? “Command economy and Market economy’’
    5·2 answers
  • All of these are features of prices, except _______.
    7·2 answers
  • Desde tu punto de vista porque se sigue presentando<br> la discriminación racial en Colombia?
    7·1 answer
  • Des Design a plan hat can be implement in lije to become a higher Personal your lifedesigner plant that can be implement in your
    14·1 answer
  • Are
    15·1 answer
  • Plz Help, and explain
    12·2 answers
  • Provide 3 to 4 well written sentences, summarizing the information from the video about the creation of a two party system in th
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!