Answer:
related and supporting industries/complementors.
Explanation:
In the given scenario Toyota effectively leveraged on its related and supporting industries/complementors.
By having a tightly knit network of suppliers in Japan, Toyota developed a fast two-way knowledge sharing—this in turn improved their quality and lowered cost, which it leveraged into a successful blue ocean strategy.
The suppliers complimented their production efforts in such a way that quality improved and cost was lowered
<span>In a channel arrangement, two or more companies at one level join together to follow a new marketing opportunity.
When a company has a channel arraignment it allows for new marketing strategies and tactics. In this situation, companies are going in together at the same level with the same power to accomplish new opportunities and goals together. </span>
Answer: The total expected cash receipts during March is $232000.
Explanation:
Given that,
Budgeted sales in January = $210000
Budgeted sales in February = $260000
Budgeted sales in March = $220000
40% of sales are for cash and rest 60% are on credit
Total cash receipts during march = cash sales in the month of march + Credit sales in the month of February + Credit sales in the month of march
= 40% of 220000 + 260000 × 60% × 50% + 220000 × 60% × 50%
= 88000+78000+66000
= $232000
Therefore, the total expected cash receipts during March is $232000.
It would be best presented as <span>movement from inside the PPF onto the PPF
The curve of </span>The production possibility frontier (<span>PPF) will show the curve that project/depict the possibilities for maximum output possibilities for two different goods. The projection that shown by the PPF is created with the assumptions that all resources are used efficiently.</span>
Firms classified as being part of the sharing economy and collaborative consumption are still considered too risky to attract substantial venture capital investment. True
Explanation:
Firms that are funded as a apart of the sharing economy are usually never as profitable as the private companies which draw more investors despite their continued success as their business models are not based on producing profits for the higher ups and have a much more horizontal structure in their firm of ownership and responsibility among the workers.
This means that their is less money in it for the investor and the administrator than it is in a top to down job which is usually the case in corporate and there is more assiduity on the work too.