Answer:
(c) pierce the corporate veil due to Sarah's commingling of interests
Explanation:
Commingling of interests usually occurs when an investment manager or realtor combines client money with their own or their firm's, in violation of a contract. This can occur in legal cases, corporate client accounts and real estate transactions. For example in this case Sarah has violated her rights as a realtor by routinely using their company funds for her own personal uses.
Answer:
Is irrelevant in decision making
Explanation:
Since the suck cost is the cost that no longer is recovered so it should not be a factor to consider when making a decision. For example, you have bought a cinema ticket for this evening, but it is heavily rainy so you may get sick if you go to the cinema. The fact that you have paid for this ticket should not consider whether to go or stay home since you can not get this amount of money no matter what happens.
Answer:
3,000
Explanation:
As the income will be taxed at 25% the income tax liability will be for that amount
12,000 x 25% = 3,000
The tax deferred liability is generated from a temporary difference. The company is paying less income tax today but will pay more in the future. Hence there is a liability.
The accounting reason for this treatment is to match expenses with the time they occur or the revenues which generated.
Answer:Conditional approval
Explanation:This is a loan that has been approved but there are still conditions which are still pending that need to be met such as some outstanding documents or other conditions such as in this case they still need to take this pledge to the subdivision sales agent.
Answer: In a majority vote, this proposal will most likely be accepted.
Explanation:
The cost of the proposed public goods is $1000, which will be shared equally among the 5 people. So, per person share on the provision of public good will be,
Since, Abby, Ben and Clara value the good more than the cost they will vote in favor of the provision. But Joe and Matt value it less than the cost so they will vote against the provision.
Value to Abby is $220 which is greater than $200.
Value to Ben is $210 which is greater than $200.
Value to Clara is $210 which is greater than $200.
Value to Joe is $180 which is less than $200.
]Value to Matt is $120 which is less than $200.
So since 3 people out of 5 vote in favor of the proposal, the public good will be provided.
