Answer:
14.037
Step-by-step explanation:
0.037+5+9
14.037
Answer:
6 2/7
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
side of square = 60 m
Step-by-step explanation:
perimeter of square = 4 × side
so,
=》240 = 4 × side
=》240 / 4 = side
=》 60 m = each side of the square .
i hope it helped..
Based on the data, the most likely correlation coefficient would be -1.
The slope between 20 and 30 days is -1, and it represents the change in the surface area of the lake per day.
The data represents correlation, not causation.
Since the data would form a perfectly straight line through the points, the correlation coefficient would be -1 for a perfect decreasing fit.
To find the slope, find the change in the surface area between those days, the change in the days, and write it as surface area/days: 80-90=-10; 30-20=10; -10/10=-1
This is not causation because there could be lurking variables we cannot see.
Answer: One possible equation could be y = -2x^2 - 3.
The equation that is given would be in the shape of an upside down parabola. It would have a maximum (vertex) at (0, -3).
The point (0, -3) would also be the y-intercept of the graph.
You could change the -2 to any other negative number and the equation would work in your problem.
