The first direct democracy in the United States can be said to be the Mayflower Compact.
<h3>What was the Mayflower Compact?</h3>
This was an agreement between the settlers of the Plymouth Colony by which male colonists agreed to vote on all matters.
This was a direct democracy because such democracies involve every member of the electorate being able to vote on all matters relating to their society.
In conclusion, this was the Mayflower Compact.
Find out more on the Mayflower Compact at brainly.com/question/355977.
Answer:
method for acquiring more insight into the hows and whys of human behavior
Explanation:
George Amos Dorsey was an American anthropologist born on February 6, 1868. According to my research on Dorsey's studies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question psychology is a method for acquiring more insight into the hows and whys of human behavior. Dorsey goes deeper in depth on this topic in his book called Hows and whys of human behavior which was written by him in 1929.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Money, while it cannot buy happiness, is an important means to achieving higher living standards. In Portugal, the average household net-adjusted disposable income per capita is USD 20 519 a year, lower than the OECD average of USD 30 563 a year.
. A limited government is structured to keep peace among all parties involved in the government. In a limited government, the people who create the laws must follow the laws, and the citizens have choice in who becomes a lawmaker.
