Under the Articles of Confederation, the principle of "republicanism" helps explain why the federal government had so little power over the states, since Republicanism stood for strong individual and state rights as opposed to strong federal rights.
Answer:
Environment is a major part of one's life. With increasing globalization, the environment has been effected only n the most adverse of ways.
One of the learned behaviours that I have learned through changing in the environment is to throw trash only in the trash can and try not to use too much plastic. The reason is that plastic is non degradable and it will never be used as something that benefits the earth, instead it ends up in places where it only hurts the living organisms.
Currently the pollution index is not too good, therefore vehicles that eat up and release too much of smoke in the environment must be used very less. Environment friendly behaviors should be adapted to get rid of smog and other harmful inhalers.
Answer:
I. Q will be 100
Explanation:
Stanford Binet I.Q test is an individualized test. it was revised by L. Terman. It is now in its 5th edition. It a cognitive ability intelligence scale that measures the I.Q level of a person. By this test, we can measure abstract thinking, concrete thinking sentence completion, etc. It is a multitasking test. It is used to diagnose the developmental disorder and disability, reading problems, etc.
M.A stands for mental ability
C.A Stands for chronological age
MA÷CA×100
11÷11×100 = 100
The IQ would be 100
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
