If this is a parabolic motion equation, then it is a negative parabola, which looks like a hill (instead of a positive parabola that opens like a cup). Your equation would be h(t)= -16t^2 + 20t +3. That's the equation for an initial velocity of 20 ft/s thrown from an initial height of 3 ft. And the -16t^2 is the antiderivative of the gravitational pull. Anyway, if you're looking for the maximum height and you don't know calculus, then you have to complete the square to get this into vertex form. The vertex will be the highest point on the graph, which is consequently also the max height of the ball. When you do this, you get a vertex of (5/8, 9.25). The 9.25 is the max height of the ball.
I found the dot plots that accompanies this problem.
Based on the plots, the <span>statement that gives is a valid comparison of the number of candies in the bags of the two Brands is:
</span><span>B. The number of candies in the bags from Brand B is greater and less consistent than the number of candies in the bags from Brand A.
Dots in Brand B are scattered and whereas dots in Brand A are not and they are more concentrated between 52 to 55 range. </span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
20/100 * 5,120 = 1024
Number of cases in 2013 = 1024 + 5120 = 6,144 cases
Answer:
35 mililiters
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Required
Accumulated amount from t = 0 to 2
This implies that, we substitute the values of t from 0 to 2 in the function
The accumulated sand (r) is:
Ok so 2cm on the blueprint is actually 7cm in real life
2:7=1:3.5
for every cm on the map, it is 3.5 times that in real life
so total legnths
17 times 3.5+18 times 3.5+18 times 3.5+19 times 3.5=
59.5+63+63+66.5=
252
answer is 252cm