Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
Answer:
(x, y) → (x+3, y-2) means Translation 3 units left and 2 units down.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the rule of transformation:
(x, y) → (x+3, y-2)
If we move horizontally 3 units to the right, 3 is added to the x-coordinate of any given point, and then 2 units down.
In other words,
(x, y) → (x+3, y-2) means Translation 3 units left and 2 units down.
For example,
Let say if we have the point A(4, 5)
Using the translation rule:
(x, y) → (x+3, y-2)
A(4, 5) → A'(4 + 3, 5 - 2) → A'(7, 3)
Therefore, the new position of A(4, 5) after translating 3 units left and 2 units down would be: A'(7, 3)
Answer:
Sam had 80 dollars in his pocket. He was feeling generous, so he handed out equal amount of money to each of his friends. After he handed out the money, he had 53 dollars left. How much did Sam give out to each one of his friends?
Step-by-step explanation:
In this real-world problem, the money he had at the beginning resembles the 80 in the equation. The -3x is the money he gives out to each of his friends. The 53 on the right-hand side is the money he has left after he gives the money away.
Answer:
literally 1
Step-by-step explanation:
scooby ate my scooby snax
A=8
B=10
Hope this helps :D
