Answer:
The answer is: State Board of Education
Explanation:
The State Board of Education refers to the policy making regulatory bodies of the state government that are responsible for establishing beneficial education policies, decision making, focusing on the long-term needs of the public education, developing rules and regulations and setting curriculum standards for the students and the teachers.
The book rightfully and logically compares the marketing mix to a meatloaf.
<h3>What is a marketing mix?</h3>
This is the term that is use to refer to the combination of the factors that the business would have to use as they try to get people to buy and use their products.
It has to do with the four p's that are said to be the way that a consumer would be able to be gotten to get a product. These are: product, price, placement, and promotion.
Hence we can cay that the book rightfully and logically compares the marketing mix to a meatloaf.
Read more on marketing mix here: brainly.com/question/859394
#SPJ1
Abstinence violation effect is the pattern of going back to chronic drinking if one slips up even little.
<h3>What is Abstinence violation effect ?</h3>
Regarding attributions following relapse after a prolonged period of abstinence or moderation, an unique procedure has been presented. The inclination to participate in a banned conduct after breaking a personal vow to refrain from it is known as the abstinence violation effect.
Relapse is viewed as a "transitional process, a series of events that unfold over time" according to Marlatt's (1985) cognitive behavioral model of relapse. Alternative models, on the other hand, consider relapse to be the moment at which treatment has failed.
To learn more about Abstinence violation effect
brainly.com/question/9508863
#SPj1
To try to keep their monopoly on silk fabrics.
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
