Don't get caught having partines
George Washington<span> advised against becoming involved in European affairs because he ... Political party </span>supported<span> by merchants, workers who depended on ... Washington's </span>response<span> to this crisis in Pennsylvania proved the strength of the ... How </span>did<span> conflicts with Britain and France affect the presidency of John Adams?</span>
Answer:
I think all of the above.
Make me brainliestt :)) teehee
Answer: A state born on democratic principles.
Explanation:
Today, the United States is considered a symbol of democracy in the world. The United States Declaration of Independence contains elements of freedom and, as such, is the first modern democratic form. The declaration is taken as the value system on which one society resides. The same document is imbued with the constitution of the United States itself, which guarantees the liberties of the individual, regardless of racial, religious or ethnic origin.
Today, through its foreign policy efforts, America seeks to extend democratic principles primarily to third world countries, some of which have been ravaged by years of conflict. The rule of the people about democracy is so far the only political framework that has at least to some extent, proved useful. So if people's representatives do not do their jobs well and efficiently, it is always possible to replace them. American democracy has evolved, adapting to the modern and contemporary principles of its society. Its fundamental values have not changed for a simple reason, the fundamental values that guarantee the freedom to every individual are constant, universal and as such, should remain.
<u><em>Explanation</em></u>:
A. Right to Freedom of speech (anonymous speech).
This principle also guarantee the right to make an anonymous speech, thus making it lawful to do so.
B. However, giving persons right to maintain anonymity would make it unlawful for law enforcement to intrude peoples private conversation which they expect to be kept anonymously.
C. The question now is which is of greater importance? Is it public safety?, or allowing individual liberties even though it poses a threat to public safety?