Answer:
Pluralist theory
Explanation:
Pluralism/pluralist theory is the view that politics and decision making lies mostly in the framework of government, but that many non-governmental/interest groups have power and exert influence with their resources. In other words that saying that groups govern the state and not the people as a whole, groups such as trade unions, business and financial lobbies, coalitions of like minded people etc.
Answer:
c. restraint
Explanation:
In psychology, there are 4 different approaches to conflict:
- Direct: The conflict is addressed in a precise, explicit language and it's solved face to face and it focuses on the topic of disagreement.
- Indirect: The conflict is addressed using Ambiguity and vagueness of words and phrases, usually it requires a third person to solve the argument and it focuses in repairing the relationship.
- Restraint: The conflict is addressed with a <u>calm tone,</u> there is a minimal display of feelings through nonverbal behavior and by <u>not showing the emotions.</u>
- Expressive: The conflict is addressed by externalizing and expressing feelings using non-verbal behavior and by showing emotions.
In this example, Tammy believes it is best to discuss issues in a calm manner, she doesn't think showing emotions is good and keeps her emotions in check. The approach that focuses on <u>having a calm tone and not showing emotions is the restraint approach.</u> Therefore, Tammy most likely uses a restraint approach to conflict.
Answer: appointed for life terms
Explanation:
Answer: Russia supported its ally Serbia.
Explanation:
After Austria-Hungary asked the commission to enter Serbia in June to investigate the murder of Franz Ferdinand, Serbia rejected the request. Austria-Hungary immediately declared war on Serbia. Austro-Hungary wanted to maintain its importance in the Balkans, and Serbia was a nuisance. After that act of Austro-Hungary, Russia immediately declared war on Austria-Hungary, considering Serbia was the main Russian ally in the Balkans.
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. The Boston Sons of Liberty showed their opposition on December 16, 1773, when they threw tea being brought into the American colonies by the British East India Company overboard the sea. The event is known as the Boston Tea Party and it was a result of the <em>Tea Act</em> passed by the British Parliament who gave their company the monopoly to import tea to the colonies.
2. I think that they decided to destroy the tea because if it got to the American colonies, they would be bought by people and this would affect the sales of tea by the American traders who sourced their tea from the Dutch. The taxes imposed on this tea as well as the monopoly that was granted to the British East India Company would also have negative consequences on the economy of the colonists.
3. They might have allowed the tea to land and then explain to the people reasons why they should boycott it. I do not think that this would have been effective because some people would have still found a way to buy the tea once it was within their reach.
4. Activism, lobbying, dialogue with the appropriate authorities, and peaceful protests should be the best routes to consider in countering laws perceived as unjust by the American citizenry.
