Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.
Answer:
When they use metaphors, similes, personification and hyperbole.
Explanation:
Such as
Simile: Her cheeks are red like a rose.
Metaphors: The snow is a white blanket.
Personification: The wind howled in the night.
Hyberbole: He's as skinny as a toothpick.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
Answer:The amygdala is commonly thought to form the core of a neural system for processing fearful and threatening stimuli (4), including detection of threat and activation of appropriate fear-related behaviors in response to threatening or dangerous stimuli.
Explanation:
<span>If Carlos is a stereotypical male, he will generally be instrumental
in general, a male will often tend to be more aggressive in order to get what they desire.
Most of the things that highly effective men do will bring them a single steps closer to the goals that they wanted to achieve</span>
