Answer:
It is also used by JavaScript to access and manipulate the element with the specific id.
Answer:We start each project to get some business benefits. We design it to achieve users and other stakeholder’s satisfaction. And we build it to improve organization KPIs. But, we live in a world where the project faces many uncertainties. These uncertainties or risks can prevent from achieving our project goals or objectives. So, it is critical that we identify them in time to take care of their effective responses.
The more we know our risks, the more we can evaluate and prioritize them timely for:
Reducing their probable negative impacts, or
Increase their likely positive impacts
We can use Qualitative Risk Analysis and Quantitative Risk Analysis techniques to evaluate and prioritize risks. I see there are a lot of confusions around how these two techniques are different from each other. In this blog, I will address these confusions and differences between these two techniques.
Before we get into the difference between qualitative and quantitative risk analysis/assessment, it is mandatory to understand how we perform risk analysis in projects. Below is the summarized demonstration of the risk analysis:
Explanation:
I think it's D because it's made out of facts. The other ones are more likely to include bias.
Answer is: Dispersants
Explanation:
Dispersants keep contaminants (e.g. soot) suspended in the oil to prevent them from coagulating. Anti-foam agents inhibit the production of air bubbles and foam in the oil which can cause a loss of lubrication, pitting, and corrosion where entrained air and combustion gases contact metal surfaces.
So that's why the answer is: Dispersants