Answer:
Nagging a spouse to stop smoking.
Explanation:
Negative reinforcement refers to a situation in which a particular behaviour is strengthened by removing a negative outcome. This concept is part of the theory of operant conditioning by B. F. Skinner. In this example, the person would stop smoking (desired behaviour) in order to avoid the nagging of a spouse (negative outcome). Therefore, this is an example of a negative reinforcement.
The correlational method is a research method in which two variables are measured for each participant and the extent to which those variables are related is measured.
Answer:
I said D even tho you might not need it now
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
"If someone attributes negative feedback to something that is within their control, they are likely to exert more effort to remedy (fix) the issue." is a true statement.
The reason behind this is that this negative feedback is coming from his own self. This means that he is aware of the issue himself and very well acknowledges his lack of indulgence and productivity.
Therefore, he is most likely to work on fixing it as compared a negative feedback that he would receive from someone else, that could also lead to him being offended about it.
Answer:
In this case, she can either file a certificate of amendment or formation with the secretary of states or she could on the other hand pull out from all equity participation in the future in the enterprise and then file a certificate stating same with the secretary of state. A request to return original contribution cannot be effective. Even is the person withdraws or sends an explanation in writing to notify of the mistake, and this is signed by general partners as well as the person, this does not exempt the person from the liability of a general partner.
Explanation: