The new industrialization made many strains on the perfect of popular government in light of the fact that many individuals lost their human rights. Individuals were chipping away at low wages and were played off each other to simply wind up noticeably heartless workers in assembly lines. Equality was lost between the rich and poor. The rich settled on every one of the choices which deciphered many existences of the laborers which were generally in negative ways. The fairness of ladies to men was all the while battling; ladies were being paid lower compensation and worked similarly as hard. Youngsters were given something to do, which insulted the communist changes. The development of the immense enterprises and extraordinary fortunes were extraordinarily fruitful with industrializing another America however made a danger to its own particular subjects. Numerous families lived in dread of getting to be plainly jobless. Laborers had no security and the legislature wasn't sufficiently speedy to authorize manages and to direct them towards specialists in production lines. The rule that America embraced were barbarous, yet at any rate there were numerous union work gatherings, despite the fact that they were shot down ordinarily, regardless we remember them today.
The answer is B. A person's own idea or explanation about something.
Hope this helps, and good luck!
Las respuestas correctas para estas preguntas abiertas son las siguientes.
1) ¿Cuál es la ventaja de que Chile genere relaciones de comercio internacional con otros países?
Una de las mayores ventajas es que pueda establecer convenios de intercambio comercial favorables para el país, que le permitan exportar sus mercancías a precios competitivos a diferentes países, incluyendo un acuerdo de tarifas razonables que incentive la exportación. De igual manera, Chile requiere importar varios insumos y productos. De ahí que necesita firmar acuerdos comerciales en los que los precios de las importaciones también sean razonables.
2) ¿Existe algún peligro para la economía nacional chilena el ser dependiente del resto de economías internacionales?
El riesgo que se corre al ser dependiente del resto de las economías es que la fluctuación de las diferentes Bolsas de Valores de países poderoso, impacte directamente en los precios de los productos y servicios que importa Chile.
Debido a la globalización, hoy existe una relación muy directa entre las economía mundiales tanto para lo bueno, como para lo malo. Por eso, cuando un país poderoso resiente un cambio en su economía, por lo regular hay consecuencias en otros países, sobre todo en países en vías de desarrollo como Chile.
Sharecropping gave white landowners the upper hand and economic dominance in Southern society.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Share cropping is a form of agriculture in which the owner of the land gives his land to the tenants where they can grow the crops and earn their livelihood. So this system of agriculture gave an upper hand to the land owners who belonged to the people of the white community and gave them an economic dominance also. It suppressed the lower sections of the society who were the tenants and who were dependent on the land owners for borrowing the land.
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
