All categories

3 years ago

F(x) = x2+3x+2 x2+5x+4 Why is there no zero at x = –1?

1 answer:

7 0

You could rewrite $F(x)$ as

$\dfrac{x^2+3x+2}{x^2+5x+4}=\dfrac{(x+1)(x+2)}{(x+1)(x+4)}$

and be tempted to cancel out the factors of $x+1$ . But this cancellation is only valid when $x\neq-1$ .

When $x=-1$ , you end up with the indeterminate form $\dfrac00$ , which is why $-1$ is not a zero.

You might be interested in

The population of the African country Uganda has been growing at a steady rate for several decades. Assuming that the current po

marusya05 [52]

According to me, 1.03M live per sq mile.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Bryan is setting in rows he has 50 black chairs and 60 white chairs

coldgirl [10]

This is not written correctly. What is the question? What do I need to find out?

6 0

3 years ago

Need help with AP CAL

anzhelika [568]

Answer: Choice C

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^2}\right)$

============================================================

Explanation:

The graph is shown below. The base of the 3D solid is the blue region. It spans from x = 0 to x = 1. It's also above the x axis, and below the curve $y = e^{-x}$

Think of the blue region as the floor of this weirdly shaped 3D room.

We're told that the cross sections are perpendicular to the x axis and each cross section is a square. The side length of each square is $e^{-x}$ where 0 < x < 1

Let's compute the area of each general cross section.

$\text{area} = (\text{side})^2\\\\\text{area} = (e^{-x})^2\\\\\text{area} = e^{-2x}\\\\$

We'll be integrating infinitely many of these infinitely thin square slabs to find the volume of the 3D shape. Think of it like stacking concrete blocks together, except the blocks are side by side (instead of on top of each other). Or you can think of it like a row of square books of varying sizes. The books are very very thin.

This is what we want to compute

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1}e^{-2x}dx\\\\$

Apply a u-substitution

u = -2x

du/dx = -2

du = -2dx

dx = du/(-2)

dx = -0.5du

Also, don't forget to change the limits of integration

If x = 0, then u = -2x = -2(0) = 0
If x = 1, then u = -2x = -2(1) = -2

This means,

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1}e^{-2x}dx = \int_{0}^{-2}e^{u}(-0.5du) = 0.5\int_{-2}^{0}e^{u}du\\\\\\$

I used the rule that $\displaystyle \int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx = -\int_{b}^{a}f(x)dx$ which says swapping the limits of integration will have us swap the sign out front.

--------

Furthermore,

$\displaystyle 0.5\int_{-2}^{0}e^{u}du = \frac{1}{2}\left[e^u+C\right]_{-2}^{0}\\\\\\= \frac{1}{2}\left[(e^0+C)-(e^{-2}+C)\right]\\\\\\= \frac{1}{2}\left[1 - \frac{1}{e^2}\right]$