Not of Bernoulli type, but still linear.

There's no need to find an integrating factor, since the left hand side already represents a derivative:
![\dfrac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}[(1+x^2)y]=(1+x^2)\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dx}+2xy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cmathrm%20d%7D%7B%5Cmathrm%20dx%7D%5B%281%2Bx%5E2%29y%5D%3D%281%2Bx%5E2%29%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cmathrm%20dy%7D%7B%5Cmathrm%20dx%7D%2B2xy)
So, you have
![\dfrac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}[(1+x^2)y]=4x^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cmathrm%20d%7D%7B%5Cmathrm%20dx%7D%5B%281%2Bx%5E2%29y%5D%3D4x%5E2)
and integrating both sides with respect to

yields


Answer:
The answer is "NOT"
Step-by-step explanation:
- To demonstrate a similar statement we want to have yet another side or some other angle, however, the third section is not proportional.
- Its sides were equivalent in proportions (yeah sure they are) + corner by the by is not given.
- There is no triangle angle provided so, that we can not enforce the SAS argument.
- It is not evidence of similarity between ABC ≈DEF.
The rule for a 270° counterclockwise rotation is (x, y) ---> (y, -x).
So if you rotated (-5,5) 270° counterclockwise around the origin the new coordinates would be (-5,-5).
Hope this Helps!!