Answer:
The reasons a registration can legally refuse to serve a partnerships are as follows :-
1. If the Registrar isn't really happy mostly with data obtained under the requirements of such LLP Act or any other details.
2. Where the title is similar to many other joint venture or company names.
3. When it's unwanted
4. If the title is the same as a name reserved under such a clause, trade marks Act or Company-related laws.
5. A title of the kind that the Minister has told the Registrar, by written notice, not to recognize for enrollment.
The relationship that the eighth and the fourth amendment have is that they are both amendments that talks about the way that the police have to act with the citizens of the nation.
<h3>What is the fourth amendment?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the amendment of the United States that forbids all forms of unreasonable searches by the police without first getting a warrant from the court of law.
<h3>What is the eight amendment?</h3>
This is the amendment in the nation that forbids all forms of cruel punishments and excessive bail condition on the people by the police form of the United States.
Read more on the amendment here: brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u>Limited governments</u> have legal restrictions imposed on their powers. Examples of these governments include the United Kingdom and <u>Germany.</u> The citizens of these countries enjoy <u>basic</u> rights such as freedom of speech and the press. However, <u>unconfined governments</u> don’t face any legal restrictions on their powers. As a result, the citizens of these governments often experience human rights violations.
Ordinance Is a law or decree by a municipality. Meanwhile precedent a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar fact, or similar legal issues.
Answer:
In the case of Parsons v. State, 1887, the Irresistible Impulse Test was first introduced.
Explanation:
The Court of Alabama stated that, although it would have been possible that the defendant had right from wrong, that he had "dismissed the power of choice between right and wrong" and that, "at a time when his free organization was destroyed," and that therefore, the alleged crime was so closely related, in relation to cause and effect, to such a mental disease that it has been the result of.
I hope this was understood very well, and as always, I am joyous to assist anyone at any time. ☺️
