<span>12.5% of 64=8 Would be the answer to this.</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
100% = 1
202.98% is more than 100%, so is more than 1.
67.14% is less than 100%, so is less than 1.
The distance formula is based on the Pythagorean Theorem:
Distance = Square Root [(X2 - X1)^2<span> + (Y2 - Y1)^</span>2<span>]
</span>Distance = Square Root [(7 -1)^2 + (-7 -1)^2]
Distance = Square Root [ 6^2 + -8^2]Distance = Square Root [ 36 + 64 ]Distance = Square Root [100 ]Distance = 10
Source:http://www.1728.org/distance.htm
Answer:
The calculated value of t= 0.1908 does not lie in the critical region t= 1.77 Therefore we accept our null hypothesis that fatigue does not significantly increase errors on an attention task at 0.05 significance level
Step-by-step explanation:
We formulate null and alternate hypotheses are
H0 : u1 < u2 against Ha: u1 ≥ u 2
Where u1 is the group tested after they were awake for 24 hours.
The Significance level alpha is chosen to be ∝ = 0.05
The critical region t ≥ t (0.05, 13) = 1.77
Degrees of freedom is calculated df = υ= n1+n2- 2= 5+10-2= 13
Here the difference between the sample means is x`1- x`2= 35-24= 11
The pooled estimate for the common variance σ² is
Sp² = 1/n1+n2 -2 [ ∑ (x1i - x1`)² + ∑ (x2j - x`2)²]
= 1/13 [ 120²+360²]
Sp = 105.25
The test statistic is
t = (x`1- x` ) /. Sp √1/n1 + 1/n2
t= 11/ 105.25 √1/5+ 1/10
t= 11/57.65
t= 0.1908
The calculated value of t= 0.1908 does not lie in the critical region t= 1.77 Therefore we accept our null hypothesis that fatigue does not significantly increase errors on an attention task at 0.05 significance level
Answer:
0.074
Step-by-step explanation:
cause in probability when two events are exclusive we use multiplication rule
