Answer:
--He is ignoring other possible explanations.
--He claims that, because one of the implications of his hypothesis is true, his hypothesis correlating obesity and personality traits is also necessarily true.
-- His hypothesis is a deduction from the evidence.
--He is allowing his hypothesis to guide his search for evidence.
Explanation:
There is a lot of psychological and biological correlations between people suffering from obesity and concerned traits. However the researcher is not considering and ignoring the other explanations that are possible. Also, the researcher claims that his hypothesis is true because some of the implications of the hypothesis he provided are true.
The researcher's hypothesis is clearly obtained from the evidences and it can be examined and tested empirically. Moreover, he is claiming that his hypothesis is in order to support his search of evidence. The hypothesis is also related to the evidence from his research. This makes the last two options as incorrect.
Ancient history of the early four ancient civilizations: Ancient Mesopotamia, ... There is evidence of trade between Ancient India and Mesopotamia as early as 3200 BCE. ... Some went to Europe and influenced the Romans and the Greeks
The answer is that "the main points follow the chronological sequence".
In a chronological sequence, we define or describe one thing after another in time. Similar is the above case in which Darci gave a speech with the central idea that c. s. lewis enjoyed reading books, following by other in time.
The way that the thermal imaging is utilized is left open to interpretation. Even though officers should knock and announce their presence before they break down a door or carry out another forced entry, exceptions apply. In this case, we can see the abuse of authority under the right of silence or Miranda warning.
Answer:
I think its B
Explanation:
If I'm wrong please let me know
