C: depositing silt, which created rich soul for growing crops.
Answer:
a) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.
Explanation:
A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: "Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefitted from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term."
This argument is most vulnerable to what criticism? It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed.The senator's argument says that the condition which is low unemployment in the state is the effect of his economic packages, but the condition existed before he ever had the chance to introduce those packages. That is the major flaw of this argument.
Answer:
Elaboration likelihood model
Explanation:
Elaboration likelihood model is defined as a theory of persuasion that suggested that persuasive messages has a kind of leverage on individuals' attitudes by two different routes, central or peripheral.
It further stated that, in a situation where by there is high motivation and ability to process messages, the individual involved often go the central route. However, when such individual has neither motivation or the ability to process the message, there is tendency to take the peripheral route.
Hence, According to ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL, people are more likely to carefully evaluate a persuasive message when their motivational state is high, and when they have the ability or knowledge to evaluate the information.
Tinker v. Des Moines, and Hazelwood v. kuhlmeier is the Supreme Court is about freedom of speech case, and United States v. Nixon is the rule of law case so the only answer is In Re Gault
