Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Answer:
$0, income statement s not affected.
Explanation:
The purchase and resale of treasury stock does not affect the income statement. When a company's treasury stock is resold, additional paid-in capital increases (if the stock were sold at a price above cost) or decreases (if the stock were sold at a price below cost).
Answer:
The given statement 'In fact,...observable' conveys the idea that <u>it is comparatively convenient and simple to calculate the amount or quantity of goods that are being produced within a firm, territory, or country to determine the economic worth directly</u>. On the other hand, estimating the amount or quantity of goods consumed by the people across a region or country is difficult and can not be observed directly. However, the latter is given more significance and determined more usually through calculating the expenditure made by the consumers depending on their choices and within their income constraints and these are the primary factors that affect the economic growth or development while the production theory lays emphasis on the maximization of profit.
Answer:
$17,000
Explanation:
Amount Deposited into checking account = $1,700 cash
Required reserve ratio = 0.10
Money multiplier = 1 ÷ Required reserve ratio
= 1 ÷ 0.10
= 10
Change in money supply = Amount deposited × Money multiplier
= $1,700 × 10
= $17,000
Therefore, the increase in total money supply would be $17,000.
Answer:
Utility
Explanation:
In economics satisfaction and pleasure is defined as a utility. When a person drinks water he/she gains utility that is a sense of satisfaction. The most important factor that increases or decreases the demand for a particular commodity is how much utility or satisfaction it provides to the end-user. Overall, the concept was first explained by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.
