Answer:
C. What the program will ultimately cost the federal government
Explanation:
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 was an attempt to make improvements or amendments to the Social Security Act. It radically changed the playing field for private plans participating in the Medicare program by substantially raising monthly payment rates in an effort to stabilize the market and reverse the decline in benefit generosity. It also provided for voluntary prescription drugs under the medicare program. However, the utilization and cost of the program skyrocketed as soon as the funding source was established. It has remained unknown what the program will ultimately cost the federal government, no wonder the current administration under Trump wants to turn it upside down.
You never decide bewteen whatever the 2 things were
Kinked demand
I hope that helped
Answer:
Red Cross took the right decision by reversing the original decision of diverting the donations. If it had diverted the donations donor will loose trust in the organisation and will not come forward to help. When it maintains a policy of honoring donor intent people will trust it to stand by it and they donated for the victims of the terrorist attack and the donations must be spent on it only. Then the trust of the donors will not fall and if the organisation wants donations for other ancillary operation sit can genuinely ask for donations and there are many people who would be willing to help. This gives both trust and respect and also the cause is served. Hence the decision to reverse the original one is correct and a good move.
Answer:
If they did not do so, they would be left without a job,t hen left without a means of supporting themselves, and supposedly their family
