About the first option: public theater satires of the fascist thinking.
No, I am pretty sure that fascism does not encourage this and quite on the contrary, it would punish this with death: in a fascist societies all people are expected to believe in the agenda
The second option: private ..., as long as the government is served.
I think that the missing word here is "businesses" - and yes, fascism would encourage this, since it would make the economy stronger
There are two types of choices when one makes a vote:
- <u>The Rational Choice:</u> A "rational" voter is conscious that voting is a personal right that is attributed to each and every one of the citizens of a given country. It is up to that voter's criteria to discern which candidate to vote for.
- <u>The Collective Voting Choice:</u> A "collective" voter will probably tend to conform with a group he or she belongs and vote according to the choice that the group has convened to be the best. People that belong to political parties or other organizations tend to be collective voters.
Regarding the case mentioned in the question, when a voter assesses a candidate's past performance, regardless of the political affiliation of this candidate, he is engaging in a "rational" vote.
<span>The answer is: Fruit of the Poisoned Tree.</span>