Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
The racist policy that I would talk about is Jim Crow
<h3>What are Jim Crow Laws?</h3>
This refers to the American segregationist policy that consisted of both state and federal laws that were racist in Southern America.
Hence, we can see that this was not only legal but it was taught openly in churches as whites were described as God's chosen people and the blacks were subhumans.
Read more about Jim Crow laws here:
brainly.com/question/452378
#SPJ1
The leader of the legislature would be democratic
A number of rights applicable to both criminal and civil legal proceedings are created by the Fifth Amendment. The fifth Amendment guarantees the correct grand jury in criminal trials, bans double jeopardy and defends against self- incrimination.
