The correct answer is primary appraisal.
According to Lazarus's theory of stress, primary appraisal refers to the process wherein individuals form a judgement or an evaluation of a stressor (an external factor or stimulus that can potentially cause stress) when they are first faced with it. Individuals might either evaluate and judge the stressor as being either a challenge or threat. For instance, if you notice that someone has been following you for a few blocks, through the process of primary appraisal you will determine whether or not its a threat.
Answer: Self-perception theory
Explanation: According to this theory, a person's attitudes and self-perception influence the behaviour of the same person, i.e what conclusion they will make about their preferences and, based on those preferences, to act, feel, cry, etc. simply have some attitude about something or someone. In other words, people interpret their own reactions to certain phenomena and people, as Juanita to her father after many years, and based on those reactions, i.e observations of their own behaviour, build attitudes, feelings, etc. According to scientists, people are inclined to be guided by their imperceptible or near imperceptible behaviours when they are in a situation or with some people, and then make decisions or, rather, conclusions about their attitudes and feelings based on these imperceptible behaviours.
<span>If a secondary group does not satisfy one's need for intimate association, B. the secondary group will break down into primary groups.
In order to prevent this from happening and in order to ensure that the secondary group stays secondary, this group has to satisfy this need in order to remain complete.
</span>
Answer: A. Stare decisis
Explanation: Stare decisis simply means aligning with precedence. Stare decisis is a legal culture which necessitates the court to look into preceeding cases when making rulings on similar cases. It obligates the court that when making ruling on a certain cases, rulings preceeding cases of similar nature, fact and structure must be considered.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the court is following legal precedent set by the ruling of a previous case in other to make decision on a current case. Therefore, the second case is an example of stare decisis.
Answer:
Why did you delete my previous answer?
Explanation:
