All categories

3 years ago

How did Brahmanism evolve into Hinduism

1 answer:

5 0

The answer -

Brahmanism is the religion of the Vedic period. Also known as Vedism or Vedic Brahmanism is the historical predecessor of Hinduism.

Its liturgy is reflected in the Mantra portion of the four Vedas, which are compiled in Sanskrit. The religious practices centered on a clergy administering rites that often involved sacrifices. This mode of worship is largely unchanged today within Hinduism; however, only a small fraction of conservative Shrautins continue the tradition of oral recitation of hymns learned solely through the oral tradition.

Elements of Vedic religion reach back into Proto-Indo-European times. The Vedic period is held to have ended around 500 BC, Vedic religion gradually metamorphosizing into the various schools of Hinduism, which further evolved into Puranic Hinduism. Vedic religion also influenced Buddhism and Jainism.

Vedic religion was gradually formalized and concluded into Vedanta, which is the primary institution of Hinduism. Vedanta considers itself the 'essence' of the Vedas. The Vedic pantheon was interpreted by a unitary view of the universe with Brahman seen as immanent and transcendent, since the Middle Upanishads also in personal forms of the deity as Ishvara, Bhagavan, or Paramatma. There are also conservative schools which continue portions of the historical Vedic religion largely unchanged until today.

During the formative centuries of Vedanta, traditions that opposed Vedanta and which supported the same, emerged. These were the nastika and astika respectively.

Hinduism is an umbrella term for astika traditions in India.
- Puranas, Sanskrit epics
- the classical schools of Hindu philosophy, of which only Vedanta is extant.
- Shaivism
- Vaishnavism
- Bhakti
- Shrauta traditions, maintaining much of the original form of the Vedic religion.

Vedic Brahmanism of Iron Age India co-existed and closely interacted with the non-Vedic (nastika) Shramana traditions. These were not direct outgrowths of Vedism, but separate movements influenced by Brahmanical traditions.

You might be interested in

complete the statement: adversarial surveillance is conducted to gather information in preparation for the following actions, ex

NeTakaya

The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above is option B. Adversarial surveillance is conducted to gather information in preparation for the following actions, except for risk fusion. The actions that are included in adversarial surveillance <span>include domestic and international terrorism, crimes against individuals, espionage, theft, stalking, and destruction of property.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Positive reinforcement increases responding and negative reinforcement ___________responding.

azamat

Increase; decrease

Punishment can be used in a positive or negative way, just like reinforcement. Any reinforcer, whether positive or negative, makes a behavioral response more likely. Positive or negative punishments both reduce the chance of a behavioral response.

What is Reinforcement?

Reinforcement is a technique used in behavioral psychology to strengthen an organism's future behavior whenever that behavior is preceded by a certain antecedent stimulus.

This strengthening effect may be quantified as increased behavior (e.g., drawing a lever more frequently), increased duration (e.g., pushing a lever for an extended period of time), increased magnitude (e.g., pulling a lever more firmly), or decreased latency (e.g., pulling a lever more quickly following the antecedent stimulus).

Self awareness, self reflection, and self regulation are the three key tenets of the self-regulatory paradigm of human behavior.

Traditionally, reinforcements support self-regulation.

Although the result may have an impact on the behavior, behavior also need antecedents.Four different types of reinforcement exist.

Positive and negative reinforcement punishment, extinction, and reinforcemen. The use of a positive reinforcer is known as positive reinforcement. In order to encourage the antecedent behavior from the subject, negative reinforcement is the practice of removing anything undesirable from the subject's environment.

To learn more about Reinforcement click on given link below

brainly.com/question/1483660

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

What is considered normal and expected about the way people do things in a specific country is referred to as __values___.?

schepotkina [342]

The correct answer is customs.

Customs refers to the social thought that portrays a customary, designed method for carrying on that is viewed as normal for life in a social framework. Shaking hands, bowing and kissing are on the whole traditions. They're methods for welcome individuals that assistance to recognize one society from another.

7 0

3 years ago

Briefly summarize the facts of the Dred Scott case and discuss the impact that the decision had on the growing conflict between

Viktor [21]

Answer:

"In April 1846, Dred and Harriet filed separate lawsuits for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court against Irene Emerson based on two Missouri statutes. One statute allowed any person of any color to sue for wrongful enslavement. The other stated that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state.

Neither Dred nor Harriet Scott could read or write, and needed both logistical and financial support to plead their case. They received it from their church, abolitionists and an unlikely source, the Blow family who had once owned them.

Since Dred and Harriet Scott had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory — both free domains — they hoped they had a persuasive case. When they went to trial on June 30, 1847, however, the court ruled against them on a technicality and the judge granted a retrial.

The Scott’s went to trial again in January 1850 and won their freedom. Irene appealed the case to the Missouri Supreme Court which combined Dred and Harriet’s cases and reversed the lower court’s decision in 1852, making Dred Scott and his family slaves again.

In November 1853, Scott filed a federal lawsuit with the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. By this time, Irene had transferred Scott and his family to her brother, John Sanford (although it was determined later that she retained ownership). On May 15, 1854, the federal court heard Dred Scott v. Sanford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery.

In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this time, the case had gained notoriety and Scott received support from many abolitionists, including powerful politicians and high-profile attorneys. But on March 6, 1857, in the infamous Dred Scott decision, Scott lost his fight for freedom again...... By the time the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision, Irene had married her second husband, Calvin Chaffee, a U.S. congressman and abolitionist. Upset upon learning his wife still owned the most infamous slave of the time, he sold Scott and his family to Taylor Blow, the son of Peter Blow, Scott’s original owner.

Taylor freed Scott and his family on May 26, 1857. Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel, but didn’t live long as a free man. At about 59 years of age, Scott died from tuberculosis on September 17, 1858."

Explanation:

Source: https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case

3 0

3 years ago

No pharaohs were bom as commoners O True o False

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago