Answer:
well maybe you just have to do something that he likes with him and get a little closer to him as a friend before you try something
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the 3rd option
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the domain (x) repeats the number 2 of the ordered pairs: (<u>2</u>,3) and (<u>2</u>,9)
Answer:When you use a radical then if it gives a decimal then you just round it however it said like to the nearest whole or however it says to do it
Step-by-step explanation:
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
