1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
3 years ago
12

What was Andrew Johnson’s role during Reconstruction

Social Studies
1 answer:
lozanna [386]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson implemented a plan of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom and offered no role to blacks in the politics of the South.

You might be interested in
2<br> Roosevelt's New Deal program did all of the following EXCEPT
AlladinOne [14]
Except: end the Great Depression
4 0
2 years ago
Dr. james found a correlation of 0.81 between scores on a measure of obesity and scores on a measure of the consumption of fast
S_A_V [24]
Strong and positive correlation.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Esther was reluctant to approach the king without being invited into his presence.
Llana [10]
The answer is true. 
:)
4 0
3 years ago
In a paragraph of 4-7 sentences, explain the Great Compromise as if you were one of the patriots there in that time.
lions [1.4K]

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

6 0
3 years ago
Historians have recently discovered a historical journal published In the early twentleth century. The journal contalns facts ba
zzz [600]

Answer/Explanation:

In the study of history as an academic discipline, a primary source (also called original source or evidence) is an artifact, a document, diary, manuscript, autobiography, a recording, or other source of information that was created at the time under study. It serves as an original source of information about the topic. Similar definitions can be used in library science, and other areas of scholarship, although different fields have somewhat different definitions. In journalism, a primary source can be a person with direct knowledge of a situation, or a document written by such a person.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Teotihuacan and oaxaca were both prominent cities during pre-columbian mexico. sharing many similarities, one aspect of their ar
    9·1 answer
  • _____ applies to laws that touch on the basic rights of a “suspect class.”
    10·2 answers
  • A 26-year-old African-American single woman is seen in the outpatient clinic with her mother. She is dressed provocatively and s
    5·1 answer
  • Which was not a likely driving factor for Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassins in Sarajevo in 1914
    7·2 answers
  • Which piece of Roosevelt’s legislation, passed in 1941, stirred up the most controversy? the cash-and-carry amendment the Neutra
    14·2 answers
  • Classical conditioning requires _____. the pairing of two stimuli chaining small actions to make one big action a dog and a bell
    13·1 answer
  • ———Is the name of a trade theory. Monopoly, Mercantilism, Barter, Imperialism
    7·1 answer
  • If my place of work relies upon an unwritten set of regulations that everyone is expected to know and follow, in all likelihood,
    5·1 answer
  • The Cuban revolution in the 1950s led to the end of the trade relationship between witch country and Cuba A. Spain B. England C.
    14·1 answer
  • Does the constitution mention separation of church and state.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!