Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The Coase theorem states that when transaction cost are low, two parties will be able to bargain and reach an efficient outcome in the presence of an externality.
The Coase Theorem also states that when conflicting property rights occur, bargaining between the parties involved will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of which party is ultimately awarded the property rights, as long as the transaction costs associated with bargaining are negligible. If trade in an externality is possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights.
Hey You!
Florida had wanted to enter as a slave state, which posed a problem and ultimately led to six years of wait.
Formula:
Hydrogen Chloride = HCl (Chemical Compound)
Sodium = Na (Chemical Element)
Reactants:
A simple definition of a reactant can be the substances that go into a chemical reaction. By substances I mean any chemical.
Products:
A simple definition of a product can be the substances produced at the end of the reaction. Again by substances I mean any chemical.
Definition of the answer:
We know that Sodium is a Chemical Element and as decribed in the picture it was mixed by Hydrogen Chloride and we know that is a Chemical Compound. So in this case the Na CI can be the product that was produced at the last and it was the result after the chemical reaction was taken place. The reactant can be the Sodium. I chose that because Reactant is a substance/chemical that goes into a chemical reaction. So as seen in the picture it went into the beaker.
Hope this helps.
according to the constitution, presidential disability can be determined by the<span>vice president and the cabinet</span>
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
