Answer:
WASHINGTON — He canceled a trip to a cemetery in France where American soldiers from World War I are buried. He did not go to the observance at Arlington National Cemetery on Veterans Day. He has not visited American troops in Iraq or Afghanistan.
And shortly after becoming commander in chief, President Trump asked so few questions in a briefing at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla., that top military commanders cut the number of prepared PowerPoint slides to three — they had initially planned 18 — said two officials with knowledge of the visit.
Explanation:
The first amendment would be the first question i’m pretty sure because it’s religious freedom and the right to free speech
Answer:
Prediction
Explanation:
Prediction:
It based on experience or observed behavior, the psychologist predicts how the behavior would be in the future if other people exhibit the same behavior in the future. For example, pavlova predicted the bell is the conditioned stimulus when the food presented to the dog. Whenever the food presented to the dog, the bell sounded. Pavlov conditioned the dog when the bell sounded and even food was not given to the dog, the salivate when the bell rang. It was a great discovery held in the field of psychology through which people at least predict the behavior of the people around them. So here we can say that Lackert Lacker, a specialty in nail polish company started with Kendel. She researched nail polish business in that area and then started the company. She predicted first and then started her business.
Olives are such an important crop in because they are used to eat and make olive oil for cooking food, putting it on bread to eat, cleaning and moisturizing skin, and to use in clay lamps, which provide the main form of light in their homes.
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
