Yes, it is fair. Younger people (Below 18) need to focus more on school. Work can take their attention off of school. And without school they wont be able to get a better job. Plus younger people can only work part time due to child labor. Most workers below 18 also have parents that's job is to feed and care for them, which means they do not even need to work until they are over 18. most people that work under the age of 18 is just for the fact of having money, not because they need it to live.
Answer:
$8,200
Explanation:
The amount of asset that is not covered under the insurance policy would not be claimable so if the amount of insurance policy that covers jewelry of worth $1000 and silverware of worth $2,500 then the total claimable insurance would be $3500 ($1000 for both Jewelry and $2500 for silverware).
The jewelry stolen is worth $5200 and out of it $4200 is not claimable because $1000 of this is covered under the insurance policy. Likewise the silverware worth of $6500 has been stolen of which $4000 is not claimable because $2500 of this is covered under the insurance policy.
The claim that would be not covered under the insurance policy would be:
Non claimable insurance amount = ($5,200 - $1,000) + ($6,500 - $2,500)
= $8,200
Answer and Explanation:
Artists' lives have been changed by digital technology. This has created different schools of thought such as the "winner take all" theory, which claims that delivering high quality products at low cost will create a world where small differences in talent demand large differences in reward, and the "long tail" theory, who claims that digital technology is creating a small portion of sellers that the market will adapt to, promoting low-cost products. These two theories are effective in different realities. However, the existence of both proves the change that programming and technology has been showing in entertainment and in the market.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Particulars Amt
Opening Cash 51907
Add: Cash Received (13400+4500) 17900
Less: Payment to supplier 5500
Less: Operating Expenses Paid 48950
Closing Cash Balance 15357
Answer:
a. $700,000
b. 6/7 or 85.7%
c. No they will not.
Explanation:
a. Jacobs will earn the normal salary that the other designers in the other companies are getting in addition to the incremental income he brings to the company as a result of his talents.
Incremental income = Revenue with Jacobs - Revenue without Jacobs
= 1,000,000 - 400,000
= $600,000
Jacobs earnings = Normal designer earnings + incremental income
= 100,000 + 600,000
= $700,000
b. Economic rent is the excess amount that the company is paying Jacobs over what it should normally cost to get a designer.
Normal cost of designer is $100,000. Company is therefore paying an economic rent of $600,000.
Proportion of Jacobs salary that is economic rent = 
= 
= 6/7 or 85.7%
c. The company hiring Jacobs will not be making an economic profit because for them to make an economic profit they would have to be making more than the $400,000 that the other firms make. They cannot make this amount because for them to do so they would have to reduce the amount they pay Jacobs. If they do so, Jacobs would leave for greener pastures and then they would be making the same $400,000 that the rest are making.
