Answer:
$44,928,000
Explanation:
The fact that 416,000 received a refund of $3,600 each means that the tax authority would lose the interest income that could have been generated on the total refund amount based on a 3% interest rate of return.
Lost annual income=number of people who got refund*average refund per person*interest rate of return
number of people who got refund=416000
average refund per person=$3,600
the interest rate of return=3%
Lost annual income=416,000*$3,600*3%
Lost annual income=$44,928,000
Answer:
Safety Stock.
Explanation:
Safety Stock is held to respond to the uncertainties in demand and supply levels because it is an additional amount of a product or material which is generally held in an inventory to mitigate or lessen the risk that a product or material will become out of
stock.
In Business management, the safety stock can be calculated using the following formula;
<em>Safety stock = (Md * Ml) - (Ad * Al) </em>
Where;
Md = maximum daily usage.
Ml = maximum lead time in days.
Ad = average daily usage.
Al = average lead time in days.
Https://quizlet.com/129490981/chapter-7-practice-flash-cards/
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws
Answer:
1550 - 1750
Explanation:
The primary mining centers in colonial Spanish America were Potosi in southern Bolivia, and Zacatecas and Guanajuato in northern Mexico. Measured in current dollars, silver worth tens billions of dollars was extracted and shipped to Europe during colonial times, but currently those places are extremely poor.