Answer:
See explanation section
Explanation:
a) Implementing an urban planning project is an example of speculative risk. There is a huge uncertainty before implementing a project as well as after its implementation regarding its gross outcomes. Projects of any type can completely fail. But there are some cases that they succeed; they may spawn some positive outcomes for a specific community. In any project, there is always a probability of both gain and loss.
b) There are a lot of possible adverse outcomes of this type of risk. Maybe the project is not running sustainably. The ground condition may not be suitable afterward, but inclement weather can reduce the desired project utilitarian. It can attribute an adverse impact on the present environment. Assume that the budget cross before the implementation of that project. Finally, these sorts of adverse outcomes may result in the project’s failure.
c) Project risk can also beget some positive outcomes. In this type of threat, after implementation of that project, it may run sustainably. The ground and atmospheric conditions may appear suitable for this specific project. The approved budget may consider sufficient for the project implementation. That is how; these sorts of positive outcomes may result in the project’s success.
d) These types of risks, both positive and negative, may create unexpected expenses. If we think about the real risks, to manage these risks, we should exploit, share and enhance the specific risk, And in case of managing the harmful risks, we should transfer into a better resource-based project or try to mitigate the negative impacts of the project. Both of these efforts can be considered as unexpected expenses.
e) To protect myself against the real risks, I’ll exploit the specific risk. Because operating the risk is about increasing the chances of positive effects, the risk may have on the project. But if it is about the detrimental risks, I’ll try to avoid the risks by doing some activities like delegating tasks, changing the deadline, and increasing the human resources of the project team.
Answer:
77%
Explanation:
Total debt to total capital ratio = Total liabilities / Total assets
Total debt to total capital ratio = $53,900 / $70,000
Total debt to total capital ratio = 0.77
Total debt to total capital ratio is the ratio of its total debt to its total capital, its debt and equity combined and it is use to measure a company financial solvency.
Answer:
Sinking fund
Explanation:
Sinking fund is a term used to describe an account that a bind trustee managed for the sole purpose of redeeming bonds early.
sinking fund: This can be seen as a type of fund that is created for the sole aim of repaying debt. It is created for the purpose of making debt easier to pay off.
The sinking fund account owner set aside a particular amount of money for a specific purpose.
Sinking funds is used to entice investors because in the case of default or bankruptcy, sinking fund will still allow investors to get their investment back. it is also a means used by corporations for bonds and deposits money to buy back issued bonds or parts of bonds before the maturity date arrives.
Answer:
8.76%
Explanation:
Using the CAPM formula:
Ke = Rf + Beta Factor * Risk premium
Here
Rf is 5%,
Beta Factor is 1.6
And
Risk Premium is 6%
By putting values, we have:
Ke = 5% + 1.6 * 6%
Ke = 14.6%
Now we will find new firm's cost of equity under 40% debt by simply multiplying it with the equity percentage:
Weighted Cost of Equity = 14.6% * 60% = 8.76%
Answer:
A.Incorrect
B. Incorrect
Explanation:
a) A manager might reject a proposal using ROI that the manager would accept using residual income
The statement is incorrect. The reverse is true. Using ROI entails the manager comparing the ROI after a project to the ROI before, where implementing a project makes the ROI after to be less than what it before the project, the Manager would most likely not implement the project. This would happen notwithstanding that the project produces positive residual income.
b) Managers will be more likely to pursue projects that will benefit the entire company when being evaluated on ROI instead of residual income.
This statement is incorrect. ROI makes the manager to pursue his own interest and that of its division at the expense of the group objectives. It leads to sub-optimal decision
