The communication pattern where <em>one partner</em> is trying to communicate and the other party is not interested and <em>retreats</em>:
- <u>C. illustrates the demand/withdraw interaction pattern. </u>
According to the given question, we are asked to show what is illustrated in the communication pattern where <em>one partner</em> is trying to communicate and the other party is not interested and <em>retreats</em>:
As a result of this, we can see that the thing which is illustrated is the demand/withdraw interaction pattern as the wife is trying to communicate, while the husband <em>does not want to communicate </em>and dialogue.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option C
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/25303180
It made them frustrated, because the stamp act would charge extra for paper products. Georgia was very loyal to the king, so this caused conflict.
Answer:
Excavations in Tilaurkot during the period of 1967-1976, revealed that the earliest coins recorded in Nepal are ‘kushan’, ‘kaniksha’ and ‘havisha’ coins (1st century) and the ‘punch marked’ coins (6th and 5th century B.C.). King Mandeva’s rule in the 5th century gave birth to the Licchavi coins. It was during the Malla period that more systemization was brought in monetary terms. Coins were then issued in denominations of 2 mohur (equivalent to one rupee), 1 mohur (50 paisa), one and a half sukka (36 paisa), sukka (25 paisa), sukki, or ‘tinnani’, (12 paisa), anni (6 paisa), adhani (3 paisa), paisa (1 paisa), and dam (1/4 paisa).
Explanation:
do u want the timeline of it
i do hav that
Germany is a democratic, federal parliamentary republic, and federal legislative power is vested in the Bundestag and the Bundesrat.
I believe Susan B. Anthony mostly focused on <span>gaining equal pay and property rights for women.
Equal pay for men and women has always been an issue, and it remains even today. Susan B. Anthony, a famous feminist and supporter of women's rights, fought to give women equal pay as men receive, and even though she didn't completely go through with her plan, she set the foundations for it to happen in the future.
Similarly, she wanted women to have property rights, which is something they didn't use to have in the past. Men were the ones who were allowed to own a property, and women did not have such rights - they used to depend on their male family members/husbands. She obviously wanted to change that and she was instrumental in this fight. </span>
