All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following best describes a situation where software should be upgraded instead of replaced?

1 answer:

6 0

Not sure what you’re asking because there’s no answers or picture to choose from, but

Example: If storage is full on a computer, you could upgrade your storage instead of getting a new computer

You might be interested in

Erik owns a restaurant in his hometown. For the upcoming summer, he would really

miskamm [114]

Answer:

Erik is using sales promotion and direct mail because he mailed coupons in hopes to attract

new customers while boosting sales at his restaurant.

Explanation:

#HOPE IT HELPS!

7 0

3 years ago

Crane WaterWorks manufactures snorkel gear. During the past month, Washington purchased 4,130 pounds of plastic to use in its di

goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer:

Direct material price variance= $53.69 unfavorable

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Actual purchase= 4,130 pounds of plastic

Actual cost= $5,972 (total)

The standard price for the plastic is $1.433 per pound.

The company used 4,060 pounds of the plastic to produce 18,500 dive masks.

To calculate the direct material price variance, we need to use the following formula:

Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity

Actual price= 5,972/4,130= $1.446

Direct material price variance= (1.433 - 1.446)*4,130= $53.69 unfavorable

5 0

3 years ago

Pina Colada Corp. just began business and made the following four inventory purchases in June: June 1 171 units $1026 June 10 22

slamgirl [31]

Answer:

$1,995

Explanation:

Using the FIFO inventory method, the amount allocated to ending inventory in June would be ;

= $1,539 + [($1,824 ÷ 228) × (228 - 171)]

= $1,539 + ($8) × (57)

= $1,539 + $456

= $1,995

Therefore, the amount allocated to June ending inventory, using FIFO inventory method is $1,995

4 0

3 years ago

Presumably, since the United States is a large country in many of its international markets, a positive optimum tariff exists fo

GuDViN [60]

Answer:

It is true that a positive optimum tariff exists for the United States because it is a large country when compared with its international partners.

If the United States uses its size and positive optimum tariff advantage to impose tariffs on imports, other countries are likely to retaliate by following its footsteps. This does not benefit any country in the long run.

Every forward-looking country that appreciates the benefits of free trade to its citizens is always careful to impose the optimum tariff on imports.

Explanation:

A tariff-imposing nation that is large enough to make some impactful difference in its welfare by imposing an optimum tariff will surely harm its partners so greatly that it will attract some retaliatory moves by the other nations. Likewise, a zero-tariff policy is counter-productive to the public interest as it harms the U.S. productive sector, jobs, and gross domestic product. This then calls for a balance and a cost minimization strategy.

7 0

3 years ago

Which statement is true. In the aggregate sense:

andriy [413]

I think the answer is D

7 0

3 years ago