I'm only 5 but i'll try to help
Michael would argue that Ramses the Second died of causes that are not to be known as it is impossible to figure them out.
Explanation:
Bruno Latour is known for his work in the studies in the filed of science and technology studies. However, his study of the practice of science was indeed at one time associated with the post truth and social constructionist movements and approaches.
Michael to take a constructionist stance would be to assume that it is impossible for such a statement to be made regarding an ancient King on the basis of meager evidence for his tuberculosis.
So he would insist that it cannot be known how he died.
Answer:
the answer is on the picture
Explanation:
<h2>#carryonlearning</h2>
When a government without limits to the extent of its power is overthrown and a new government founded with strict procedural limits to its power is installed, such a shift would be characterized as a shift from an absolute monarchy (Autocracy) to democracy
<h3>What is An absolute Monarchy
?</h3>
Absolute monarchy is a type of monarchy where the monarch wields absolute authority to govern, and hence, rules as the sovereign government's head of state with no limitations on the power of the monarch over the state (subject)
<h3>What is a Democracy?</h3>
A democracy is a form of government where the people have the authority to elect governing officials and they also have the power to carry out their own legislation
Learn more about forms of government at brainly.com/question/18862016.
Answer:
in my opinion he comes after neil armstrong because he was pretty cool , a lot of them did the same thing but in different ways!
Explanation:
let me know if this helped.
