Answer: The Affluent Society (1958)
Explanation:
Among the surging affluence of the supposed “happy days” decade, there was also growing anxiety, dissent, and diversity. Many social critics, writers, and artists expressed a growing sense of unease with the superficiality of the much-celebrated consumer culture. One of the most striking aspects of the decade was the sharp contrast between the buoyant public mood and the increasingly bitter social criticism coming from intellectuals, theologians, novelists, playwrights, poets, and artists. One of those intellectuals was John Kenneth Galbraith in his book The Affluent Society (1958). He could not see in the economic growth a solution for persistent social problems. He pointed out that behind all of America's prosperity, there was still the ghost of poverty, especially among minorities.
The correct answers are: accuracy and honesty.
Indeed, being a historian take a lot of patience since research takes lots of effort and money. Accuracy in important, since the thread of events, the people involved and the multiplicity of factors that influence an event need to be carefully studied, verified and analyzed. Honesty is paramount, since past history inevitably has had an effect on present times and any falsification would not only have devastating effect in current politics but also would inevitably damage research on other fields which depend on history to yield accurate and satisfactory results. This is why bias is definitely to be banned from the profession.
The answer is the English Imperialist.
The Englishmen had a more efficient route to Asian
countries. They call this route as the Northeastern Route. They discovered the route around 1800’s that
they were able to utilized this route. Since then, they had used this route to
reach their destinations faster.
Answer:
Good choice:
B. Progressive Era.
Explanation:
Harding and his immediate successors were rather supporters of laissez-faire economics, they didn´t see a large role for the government in controlling the economy nor the market, he believed in entrepreneurship. He was a Republican. He opposed major engagement by the US in foreign affais, unlike Woodrow Wilson.
