Merrill Lynch, the investment firm, hired Elliot Jarvin as director of wealth management services. His duties included managing
a team of 10 wealth managers who advised Merrill Lynch clients regarding their investment portfolios. When Jarvin joined Merrill Lynch, he brought with him 15 very wealthy clients to whom he provided investment services on behalf of Merrill Lynch. Unknown to Merrill Lynch, Jarvin had five additional clients, the five wealthiest of his clients. Jarvin continued to advise these clients on his own, retaining for himself all fees he charged for services provided to the five clients. In addition, to help him service the five personal clients, two members of his Merrill Lynch wealth management team frequently met with Jarvin’s five personal clients to create investment plans for them. Has Jarvin breached a fiduciary duty owed to Merrill Lynch?
Yes, Elliot breached his fiduciary duties with Merrill Lynch.
Explanation:
Since Elliot is an employee of Merrill Lynch, he owes the company fiduciary duties, that means that Elliot should always act on the best interest of his employer (Merrill Lynch), and he must also avoid any personal conflict of interest between him and his employer.
Elliot is not acting on the best interest of his employer, instead he is benefiting from the position given to him by his employer (by requiring advice from other employees).
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
The buyers, as well as sellers, must negotiate an understanding as to who is capable of paying certain transport costs and also who, whenever the item is delivered, assumes the default risk throughout transportation.
A seller reports compensation whenever the purchaser has the transition of titles as well as ownership uncertainties.
The other three options are not related to a certain scenario. So that option C is the right answer.
